Beyond tumor response,ROMVIMZA delivered significant improvement
in ROM vs placebo1,2
Almost5XGreater
improvementin active ROM vs placebo at 6 months1,2
ROM improved 18.4% with ROMVIMZA vs 3.8% with placebo
(95% CI: 4.0, 25.3; P=0.0077)1,2
Average total ROM achieved at 6 months1,2
ROMVIMZA
From 63.0% at baseline to 83.6%
Placebo
From 62.9% at baseline to 68.3%
Tumor locations included in the ROM analysis included the knee (67%), ankle (12%), hip (10%), other (5%), foot (3.3%), and wrist (2.4%).1
How ROM was measured and defined2-4
ROM was assessed by goniometry and expressed as mean percentage change from baseline relative to a reference standard for the affected joint
Total ROM is the total possible movement for a specific joint, eg, total ROM of a knee is 135°
CI=confidence interval; ROM=range of motion.
CI=confidence interval; ROM=range of motion; TGCT=tenosynovial giant cell tumor.
Patients on ROMVIMZA experienced
rapid (as early as Week 5) and sustained (through 6 months) improvements in physical function and BPI-worst pain1,6
Improved physical function at 6 months:
4.6 points with ROMVIMZA vs 1.3 points with placebo (95% CI: 1.4, 5.2; P=0.0007)1,2
(PROMIS-PF)1-3,6
PROMIS-PF measures a patient’s ability to do a range of daily activities3
15-item questionnaire assessed tumor location-specific (upper vs lower extremity) physical function3
Data for PROMIS-PF is largely based on lower limb extremity assessment due to tumor location1
Limitations
These results reflect observed mean values and are provided as supportive context to the primary analysis
In an open-label extension, there is a potential for enrichment of the long-term data for the PROs in the remaining patient populations since patients who are unable to tolerate or do not respond to the drug often drop out
Patients with clinically meaningful reduction at 6 months
P=0.0056
Patients were asked to rate their worst pain in the last 24 hours on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine)3
BPI responder: experienced at least a 30% decrease in mean BPI worst pain and did not experience a 30% or greater increase in narcotic analgesic use at week 251
*Clinically meaningful threshold: ≥3 point increase from baseline in PROMIS-PF score at Week 25.2,3
BPI=Brief Pain Inventory; LS=least squares; PROMIS-PF=Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (TGCT-specific); PROs=patient-reported outcomes.
“Symptomatic benefit was not limited to patients who had objective responses per RECIST; patients receiving ROMVIMZA who had stable disease also had a meaningful improvement in active range of motion and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures.”2
Gelderblom H, et al. Lancet. 2024.